having trouble selecting a candidate?

Eyeque
10-30-2007, 04:24 PM
A TV station in Moline, Illinois, offers this interesting feature. Just answer a few basic questions, and it will match your opinions with those of the major candidates for next year's election. You are not asked to give your name. http://www.wqad.com/Global/link.asp?L=259460

Rider
10-30-2007, 04:38 PM
Thats awesome. Looks like I need to vote for Rudy Guiliani. We agree on everything. :dthumb:

JK_DILLA
10-30-2007, 04:45 PM
Looks l ike the Dems and i are polar opposites.

marko138
10-30-2007, 04:55 PM
Countdown to when some members get their panties in a wad and the thread goes down in flames: 10...9...8...

smileyman
10-30-2007, 04:56 PM
Whew! Thank God that took a load off my mind. Now I know who to vote for so I will turn my attention once again to finding a cure for cancer and solving the Kennedy assassination...After that come up with a way to get rid of all the UFOs..:leaving:

Eyeque
10-30-2007, 05:45 PM
Countdown to when some members get their panties in a wad and the thread goes down in flames: 10...9...8... yikes...I guess that didn't occur to me for some reason. Let's talk about something less controversial. What oil is best? hahaha!

Ineffable
10-30-2007, 05:53 PM
What happened to to good ole days of just a few candidates rather than the cluster**** of people we have now.

King Bob
10-30-2007, 06:02 PM
Whew! Thank God that took a load off my mind. Now I know who to vote for so I will turn my attention once again to finding a cure for cancer and solving the Kennedy assassination...After that come up with a way to get rid of all the UFOs..:leaving: cancer is treated by diet coke, kennedy is living in china under an assumed name, and the UFOs will go away if you just put on the tinfoil hat the voices keep telling you to wear.

Rae
10-30-2007, 06:06 PM
thats it, I am moving to another country!! yee gawd, I didnt like how that turned out at all!!

PlayfulGod
10-30-2007, 06:28 PM
thats it, I am moving to another country!! yee gawd, I didnt like how that turned out at all!! :slol:

NONE_too_SOFT
10-30-2007, 06:29 PM
What happened to to good ole days of just a few candidates rather than the cluster**** of people we have now. its called the primaries pal...

PlayfulGod
10-30-2007, 06:30 PM
I would about say I dont give a f**k who wins as long as it isnt Hilary Clinton. :slol:

OneSickPsycho
10-30-2007, 10:49 PM
Countdown to when some members get their panties in a wad and the thread goes down in flames: 10...9...8... I feel obligated now... Ok here's the deal... Until the Dems select a candidate that doesn't suck my hairy butthole, they will never get my vote. Not especially impressed with some of the Rep choices, though a couple have caught my interest. Dems just seem really out of touch with what I consider important and/or correct... Which sucks, because Dem's are the 'feel good' choice... unfortunatly more taxes, bigger government, and less personal accountability do not make me feel good.

trock
10-30-2007, 11:23 PM
I have a bunch of no names at the top of my list. Barack is my lowest and Hilary is 1 point above him. Guiliani is my highest big name candidate.

drewpy
10-30-2007, 11:56 PM
my vote would goto bill, but never hilary, she is too much of a wacko for me

Scissors
10-31-2007, 08:00 AM
Quiz Results Below are the candidates ranked by how much you agree with their stances. Rudy Giuliani Score: 38 John McCain Score: 29 Joe Biden Score: 29 Bill Richardson Score: 28 Mitt Romney Score: 26 John Edwards Score: 25 Ron Paul Score: 23 Dennis Kucinich Score: 22 Jim Gilmore Score: 21 Mike Huckabee Score: 21 Fred Thompson Score: 19 Duncan Hunter Score: 19 Barack Obama Score: 18 Hillary Clinton Score: 18 Tom Tancredo Score: 16 Sam Brownback Score: 16 Chris Dodd Score: 15 Mike Gravel Score: 15

VatorMan
10-31-2007, 08:04 AM
Looks like I'm a McCain guy.

Scissors
10-31-2007, 08:05 AM
Looks like I'm a McCain guy. How'd you score on Giuliani?

Rider
10-31-2007, 08:49 AM
How'd you score on Giuliani? I got a 77 on him.

smileyman
10-31-2007, 09:12 AM
I was a McCain guy. Not that the elected will have any choice but to do exactly what his(or her) campaign supporters have purchased him for, $$$$$

Scissors
10-31-2007, 09:41 AM
A term of six years with a limit of just one term would be one way to eliminate the four initial "lame duck" years that every President goes through while trying to appease everyone and get re-elected.

Rider
10-31-2007, 09:45 AM
A term of six years with a limit of just one term would be one way to eliminate the four initial "lame duck" years that every President goes through while trying to appease everyone and get re-elected. 4 years with a bad president is bad enough. I dont want to see some guy in there for 6 years if he is doing a horrible job.

marko138
10-31-2007, 09:49 AM
4 years with a bad president is bad enough. I dont want to see some guy in there for 6 years if he is doing a horrible job. We're going on 8 years of this current douche bag...how much worse can it get?

kbubp
10-31-2007, 09:51 AM
Thats awesome. Looks like I need to vote for Rudy Guiliani. We agree on everything. :dthumb: **** that lying piece of ****. All he does is tout 911 and he is a huge ****ing hypocrite. RON PAUL '08

Rae
10-31-2007, 09:53 AM
okay, lets not get heated here...it's only for fun!! :skep:

Scissors
10-31-2007, 09:54 AM
4 years with a bad president is bad enough. I dont want to see some guy in there for 6 years if he is doing a horrible job. Yeah, but 4 years of a good president isn't enough to do anything positive. Thus the six year compromise. It's better than eight years.

Scissors
10-31-2007, 09:56 AM
Hey, now, no need for anyone to mention any specific presidents--past or present. This isn't a "my favorite president has a bigger package than your favorite president" thread. :lol:

kbubp
10-31-2007, 09:56 AM
okay, lets not get heated here...it's only for fun!! :skep: :) I am having fun. I love politics. Debating is how I get my jollies.

kbubp
10-31-2007, 09:57 AM
okay, lets not get heated here...it's only for fun!! :skep: Below are the candidates ranked by how much you agree with their stances. Ron Paul Score: 47 Agree Iraq Taxes Stem-Cell Research Health Care Abortion Social Security Line-Item Veto Energy Marriage Disagree Immigration Death Penalty John McCain Score: 38 Agree Taxes Stem-Cell Research Health Care Abortion Social Security Energy Marriage Death Penalty Disagree Iraq Immigration Line-Item Veto Tom Tancredo Score: 32 Agree Immigration Taxes Stem-Cell Research Health Care Abortion Social Security Disagree Iraq Line-Item Veto Energy Marriage Death Penalty Rudy Giuliani Score: 30 Agree Taxes Health Care Social Security Line-Item Veto Marriage Death Penalty Disagree Iraq Immigration Stem-Cell Research Abortion Energy Fred Thompson Score: 28 Agree Taxes Stem-Cell Research Health Care Abortion Social Security Death Penalty Disagree Iraq Immigration Line-Item Veto Energy Marriage Duncan Hunter Score: 28 Agree Taxes Stem-Cell Research Health Care Abortion Social Security Death Penalty Disagree Iraq Immigration Line-Item Veto Energy Marriage Sam Brownback Score: 25 Agree Taxes Stem-Cell Research Health Care Abortion Social Security Disagree Iraq Immigration Line-Item Veto Energy Marriage Death Penalty Mike Huckabee Score: 23 Video Agree Stem-Cell Research Health Care Abortion Social Security Death Penalty Disagree Iraq Immigration Taxes Line-Item Veto Energy Marriage Jim Gilmore Score: 23 Agree Taxes Stem-Cell Research Health Care Social Security Death Penalty Disagree Iraq Immigration Abortion Line-Item Veto Energy Marriage Dennis Kucinich Score: 17 Agree Iraq Line-Item Veto Marriage Disagree Immigration Taxes Stem-Cell Research Health Care Abortion Social Security Energy Death Penalty Mitt Romney Score: 15 Agree Taxes Health Care Death Penalty Disagree Iraq Immigration Stem-Cell Research Abortion Social Security Line-Item Veto Energy Marriage Bill Richardson Score: 15 Video Agree Iraq Marriage Death Penalty Disagree Immigration Taxes Stem-Cell Research Health Care Abortion Social Security Line-Item Veto Energy Hillary Clinton Score: 13 Agree Line-Item Veto Marriage Death Penalty Disagree Iraq Immigration Taxes Stem-Cell Research Health Care Abortion Social Security Energy Barack Obama Score: 13 Video Agree Line-Item Veto Marriage Death Penalty Disagree Iraq Immigration Taxes Stem-Cell Research Health Care Abortion Social Security Energy Joe Biden Score: 13 Agree Social Security Marriage Death Penalty Disagree Iraq Immigration Taxes Stem-Cell Research Health Care Abortion Line-Item Veto Energy Mike Gravel Score: 12 Agree Iraq Marriage Disagree Immigration Taxes Stem-Cell Research Health Care Abortion Social Security Line-Item Veto Energy Death Penalty Chris Dodd Score: 10 Video Agree Line-Item Veto Marriage Disagree Iraq Immigration Taxes Stem-Cell Research Health Care Abortion Social Security Energy Death Penalty John Edwards Score: 8 Video Agree Marriage Death Penalty Disagree Iraq Immigration Taxes Stem-Cell Research Health Care Abortion Social Security Line-Item Veto Energy

smileyman
10-31-2007, 10:01 AM
A term of six years with a limit of just one term would be one way to eliminate the four initial "lame duck" years that every President goes through while trying to appease everyone and get re-elected. Our election system needs some work...I know, let's do it like American Idol, where we vote a candidate off every month till election time! Then if the one we end up with is doing a terrible job we send him to "Survivor", if he does well "Dancing with the Stars"!

Scissors
10-31-2007, 10:28 AM
Our election system needs some work...I know, let's do it like American Idol, where we vote a candidate off every month till election time! Then if the one we end up with is doing a terrible job we send him to "Survivor", if he does well "Dancing with the Stars"! At least it's a system the common man can understand. :lol:

PlayfulGod
10-31-2007, 10:34 AM
At least it's a system the common man can understand. :lol: yea its called the people vote but that doesnt count. Its the electoral vote the elects.

Scissors
10-31-2007, 10:43 AM
yea its called the people vote but that doesnt count. Its the electoral vote the elects. Well, the people's vote does count indirectly; just as it does with bills that are passed by Congress, and bills that are passed or vetoed by the President. We have representatives in order to prevent a tyranny of the majority. People in general are stupid and panicky. While representatives tend to also be stupid and panicky, they are significantly less so than your average voter. :lol:

smileyman
10-31-2007, 10:54 AM
"The needs of the many, out weigh the needs of the few" Mr Spock was a closet communist!:yikes: Never underestimate the stupidity of people in large groups!

PlayfulGod
10-31-2007, 10:55 AM
Well, the people's vote does count indirectly; just as it does with bills that are passed by Congress, and bills that are passed or vetoed by the President. We have representatives in order to prevent a tyranny of the majority. People in general are stupid and panicky. While representatives tend to also be stupid and panicky, they are significantly less so than your average voter. :lol: and 9 times out of 10 will do/say what ever is neeeded to secure their job :lol: Even tho they never have any intension to follow thru with any of it :lol:

z06boy
10-31-2007, 11:04 AM
Mitt Romney ??? WTF ? Maybe I'll take the quizz again...:leaving:

Eyeque
10-31-2007, 11:05 AM
Their all crooks, hucksters and swindlers leading a shadow goverment of killers and liars...let's just all write in Jessica Alba and call it a day.

drewpy
10-31-2007, 11:10 AM
sad to say, if i had to do it allover again, GORE

OneSickPsycho
10-31-2007, 11:10 AM
A term of six years with a limit of just one term would be one way to eliminate the four initial "lame duck" years that every President goes through while trying to appease everyone and get re-elected. Not a terrible idea... We're going on 8 years of this current douche bag...how much worse can it get? :lol: **** that lying piece of ****. All he does is tout 911 and he is a huge ****ing hypocrite. RON PAUL '08 IWfIhFhelm8 I like this guy more and more each day... yea its called the people vote but that doesnt count. Its the electoral vote the elects. Sounds like a lot of uneducated opinions I've heard on the subject...

OneSickPsycho
10-31-2007, 11:12 AM
sad to say, if i had to do it allover again, GORE I bet we'd have more internetz... and taxes.

Rider
10-31-2007, 11:19 AM
I bet we'd have more internetz... and taxes. And no rock music.......:leaving:

drewpy
10-31-2007, 11:21 AM
damn, that was a good vid, i would rep you if i could

drewpy
10-31-2007, 11:22 AM
i said it was a sad vote, but it would of been the lesser of the two evils

OneSickPsycho
10-31-2007, 11:25 AM
Political thread that's lasted 3 pages? WOW!

Scissors
10-31-2007, 11:28 AM
and 9 times out of 10 will do/say what ever is neeeded to secure their job :lol: Even tho they never have any intension to follow thru with any of it :lol: Verily so. Which is why getting reelected should never be legal without, say, 80% of the vote. :lol:

Rider
10-31-2007, 11:30 AM
Political thread that's lasted 3 pages? WOW! The good bashing hasnt even started yet. :idk: We are in rare form indeed.

OneSickPsycho
10-31-2007, 11:34 AM
The good bashing hasnt even started yet. :idk: We are in rare form indeed. Well then... Fluck you and your politics Rider!!!

Scissors
10-31-2007, 11:37 AM
The good bashing hasnt even started yet. :idk: We are in rare form indeed. I provide a calming influence to the forum.

Rider
10-31-2007, 11:42 AM
Well then... Fluck you and your politics Rider!!! Actually I think you and I see eye to eye on most political issues. So fluck you! :nee: :lol:

OneSickPsycho
10-31-2007, 11:44 AM
Actually I think you and I see eye to eye on most political issues. So fluck you! :nee: :lol: That's half the reason I said it. :loser:

z06boy
10-31-2007, 11:46 AM
I provide a calming influence to the forum. :rofl3: Yes so far but subject to change at any moment.

Scissors
10-31-2007, 12:04 PM
:rofl3: Yes so far but subject to change at any moment. :whistle:

z06boy
10-31-2007, 12:37 PM
:whistle: :cheers: w!ngnut:leaving:

PlayfulGod
10-31-2007, 01:02 PM
:slol:

VatorMan
10-31-2007, 01:51 PM
:whistle: Some People become very brAve And bold with the anonymity of being behind A Computer screen. They just dont ReAlize how Vunerable they reAlly aRe! Please try to be Less vulgAR & judgementAl in the Future. Scissors Wish you could be here. (Not!) Just becAuse you were born of swiNe, dosen't Mean we ALL were! Your FRiend @CF

Scissors
10-31-2007, 02:18 PM
Some People become very brAve And bold with the anonymity of being behind A Computer screen. They just dont ReAlize how Vunerable they reAlly aRe! Please try to be Less vulgAR & judgementAl in the Future. Scissors Wish you could be here. (Not!) Just becAuse you were born of swiNe, dosen't Mean we ALL were! Your FRiend @CF :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

byron12
10-31-2007, 04:20 PM
Thats awesome. Looks like I need to vote for Rudy Guiliani. We agree on everything. :dthumb: rudy guiliani is a fascist all you guys that say no big government intrusion are signing up for just that with rudy guliani just look at his record as mayor of new york. What do you want more the government taking care of you and providing you with "safety" or the freedom to look after yourself.

byron12
10-31-2007, 04:26 PM
I managed to disagree with every single candidate on Iraq except tom candredo who the hell is that guy....:slol:

Rider
10-31-2007, 04:32 PM
rudy guiliani is a fascist all you guys that say no big government intrusion are signing up for just that with rudy guliani just look at his record as mayor of new york. What do you want more the government taking care of you and providing you with "safety" or the freedom to look after yourself. You obviously know nothing about the guy. A fascist? Do you know the true definition of fascism? The guy doesnt want to control anything. He is against socailized medicine, he is for the death penalty, he is for abortion, he is against the line item veto, he is for privatization of social security, he is for tax reductions... You need to get your facts straight or look up the definition of fascism. :loser:

Eyeque
10-31-2007, 04:39 PM
...and this is when things go downhill fast and hilarity ensues...

Rae
10-31-2007, 04:42 PM
:yaewn: I am watching ya'll...:lol:

Rider
10-31-2007, 04:44 PM
:yaewn: I am watching ya'll...:lol: :skep: :skep: :nee :seeya:

marko138
10-31-2007, 05:14 PM
:yaewn: I am watching ya'll...:lol: Me too. Infractions will follow. Trust that.

Scissors
10-31-2007, 05:27 PM
Fascism is "...a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition." I wouldn't say any of the candidates fall under that definition. At least, not as long as what they're telling us they believe is really what they believe.

Eyeque
10-31-2007, 06:07 PM
Ooohhh...we're being watched. How politically voyeuristic!

PlayfulGod
10-31-2007, 06:39 PM
watching what?? :lol:

SVRider
10-31-2007, 06:48 PM
watching what?? :lol: PORN :leaving:

PiZdETS
10-31-2007, 06:58 PM
Rudy Giuliani Score: 42 Agree; Iraq Stem-Cell Research Health Care Abortion Social Security Line-Item Veto Energy Marriage Disagree; Immigration Taxes Death Penalty followed by chris dodd, joe biden and....holy chit...kucinich :yikes: :yikes:

PlayfulGod
10-31-2007, 07:25 PM
PORN :leaving: I rather watch that than politics :lol:

SVRider
10-31-2007, 07:54 PM
I rather watch that than politics :lol: I'd rather watch a blank TV than politics.

Scissors
10-31-2007, 08:04 PM
I'd rather watch a blank TV than politics. http://www.runswithscissors.info/images/statements/ohsnapbear.jpg

OneSickPsycho
11-01-2007, 02:49 AM
Ooohhh...we're being watched. How politically voyeuristic! I know it makes me hot...

smileyman
11-01-2007, 09:09 AM
OK back to talking about Brittany Spears....:slol:

kbubp
11-01-2007, 09:24 AM
You obviously know nothing about the guy. A fascist? Do you know the true definition of fascism? The guy doesnt want to control anything. He is against socailized medicine, he is for the death penalty, he is for abortion, he is against the line item veto, he is for privatization of social security, he is for tax reductions... You need to get your facts straight or look up the definition of fascism. :loser: He's not for the Constitution... 2nd Amendment especially. He loves illegal immigrants, making NYC a "safe-haven" for them. He is a damn criminal. And Pro-Abortion? Since when is this a good thing? Here's an idea, let's teach responsibility instead of teaching people that they don't need to be responsible.

kbubp
11-01-2007, 09:25 AM
I'd rather watch a blank TV than politics. Then perhaps you should move to a different country, Sweden is good.

kbubp
11-01-2007, 09:26 AM
Me too. Infractions will follow. Trust that. With this threat, I will need the section of the rules that state whatever part you think the people in this thread are going to abuse. Thank you.

Rider
11-01-2007, 09:31 AM
He's not for the Constitution... 2nd Amendment especially. He loves illegal immigrants, making NYC a "safe-haven" for them. He is a damn criminal. And Pro-Abortion? Since when is this a good thing? Here's an idea, let's teach responsibility instead of teaching people that they don't need to be responsible. Why not like illegal immigrants, they work harder than you or I do. And yes pro abortion. Let the woman decide what is best for her body not the government. Yes you still need to teach resposibility, but that wont fix everything. How about women who are inpregnated by rape? What about a crack head? you want a crack head giving birth? What about the welfare mom who already has 8 kids?

VatorMan
11-01-2007, 09:45 AM
Annnndd Heeeerrrre we go.:pity:

kbubp
11-01-2007, 10:02 AM
Why not like illegal immigrants, they work harder than you or I do. And yes pro abortion. Let the woman decide what is best for her body not the government. Yes you still need to teach resposibility, but that wont fix everything. How about women who are inpregnated by rape? What about a crack head? you want a crack head giving birth? What about the welfare mom who already has 8 kids? Work ethic has nothing to do with legality. They are here illegally, they are committing a crime every second that they are on US soil. You like to help criminals? Impregnated by rape? Perhaps this could be a special case in which abortion would be ok. Do I want a crack head giving birth? Well most likely, if they are a crack head, their baby will be deformed and probably die anyway. Welfare mothers? Well, funny thing about that, welfare needs to be reformed as well. These people need to be cut off after a certain point in time. The welfare policy should be something like "you have x amount of time to either **** or get off the pot, after that, we aren't helping you." This isn't China, if you want government handouts, go to a Communist society.

Rider
11-01-2007, 10:06 AM
Work ethic has nothing to do with legality. They are here illegally, they are committing a crime every second that they are on US soil. You like to help criminals? Impregnated by rape? Perhaps this could be a special case in which abortion would be ok. Do I want a crack head giving birth? Well most likely, if they are a crack head, their baby will be deformed and probably die anyway. Welfare mothers? Well, funny thing about that, welfare needs to be reformed as well. These people need to be cut off after a certain point in time. The welfare policy should be something like "you have x amount of time to either **** or get off the pot, after that, we aren't helping you." This isn't China, if you want government handouts, go to a Communist society. No I actually think we should close up the borders and not let anyone else in, but the ones that are already here, make them legal. You bring up a good point about welfare. I am against it entirely. It should be done away with all together and unemployment too for that matter.

kbubp
11-01-2007, 10:15 AM
No I actually think we should close up the borders and not let anyone else in, but the ones that are already here, make them legal. You bring up a good point about welfare. I am against it entirely. It should be done away with all together and unemployment too for that matter. Right. The Government isn't meant to be the guardians of it's citizens (Mommies and Daddies to the people, in layman's terms). We should also get rid of the IRS and go back to a Gold Standard on our money and abolish the Federal Reserve. Nothing better than printing money that we don't really have.

smileyman
11-01-2007, 11:24 AM
China really DOESNT hand out to it's population. Neither does the Russia or other communist ex affiliates....

PlayfulGod
11-01-2007, 11:37 AM
China really DOESNT hand out to it's population. Neither does the Russia or other communist ex affiliates.... You dont want to be poor and live in China :lol: Nor do you want to be born retard, disfigured, etc. in China. You wouldnt believe the horror those types of people live in in other parts of the world.

Scissors
11-01-2007, 11:39 AM
Work ethic has nothing to do with legality. They are here illegally, they are committing a crime every second that they are on US soil. Actually, no. This is a common misinterpretation of the law. Thus the reason a bill was written up to also make it illegal to be here after having crossed illegally. In truth, it is the crossing of the border illegally which is the crime. Just like how in Virginia if you enter an establishment that you know to not allow handguns, and you have a handgun, you have committed the crime of trespassing once upon entering, not once per second that you remain in there.

Scissors
11-01-2007, 11:40 AM
We should...go back to a Gold Standard on our money and abolish the Federal Reserve. Nothing better than printing money that we don't really have. That would be incredibly stupid. Hopefully that was sarcasm. :lol:

kbubp
11-01-2007, 11:48 AM
That would be incredibly stupid. Hopefully that was sarcasm. :lol: Really? So it's smart to base the value of the dollar on the word of one man instead of basing it on a solid standard. Good point...:yaewn:

Scissors
11-01-2007, 12:13 PM
Really? So it's smart to base the value of the dollar on the word of one man instead of basing it on a solid standard. It isn't based upon the word of one man. It's based upon the work of billions. That's part of the free market. The gold standard is definitely not solid and is antiquated and inferior for several reasons. Not the least of which is the fact that as inflation continues, you reach a point where your currency represents microscopic amounts of gold, eventually to where your dollar represents an atom of gold, or even a fraction of an atom. Also, the gold standard doesn't protect against any of the issues seen with currency not backed by gold. Inflation and deflation still happen, currencies in different countries still change in relation to each other, and gold itself doesn't hold a stable value. Additionally, there simply isn't enough gold in the world to support such a system for the massive amount of trade and production which now takes place; and an effective gold standard would require that most nations (and all rich nations) adhere and agree to it.

NONE_too_SOFT
11-01-2007, 12:16 PM
We're going on 8 years of this current douche bag...how much worse can it get? dont you watch scary movies? what allways happens when they say that?

tallywacker
11-01-2007, 01:31 PM
Well as soon as the war ends there is going to be ten of thousands of people that are going to be out of work because of the many industries support every aspect of it. Im afraid that when pull out and the military goes back into standby there is going to be a large drop in the economy. The war is almost acting like an economic band-aid right now. There are 100's of medium size companies that started up that are relying completely on it. Sad days to come I assure you.

marko138
11-01-2007, 03:30 PM
With this threat, I will need the section of the rules that state whatever part you think the people in this thread are going to abuse. Thank you. No deal, Jack. I don't answer to you.

kbubp
11-01-2007, 04:18 PM
No deal, Jack. I don't answer to you. How appropriate that you make that statement in this thread. Actually, you do answer to me and all the other members that you are serving. You are part of TWF's government. kthnx.

smileyman
11-01-2007, 04:38 PM
Damn! I hope he isn't:gary: Alll the other gov't folks are these days!:nonod:

Eyeque
11-01-2007, 04:42 PM
...you do answer to me and all the other members that you are serving. You are part of TWF's government.kthnx. Who do I speak with about getting my free TWF goverment cheese?

PlayfulGod
11-01-2007, 04:50 PM
There some funny poop in this thread :lol:

marko138
11-01-2007, 05:44 PM
How appropriate that you make that statement in this thread. Actually, you do answer to me and all the other members that you are serving. You are part of TWF's government. kthnx. Wrong. I wasn't elected by you. I can make you go away.

kbubp
11-01-2007, 07:01 PM
Wrong. I wasn't elected by you. I can make you go away. How noble of you to threaten me.

1/4Mile@ATime
11-01-2007, 07:55 PM
Joe Biden Score: 39 Marriage Mitt Romney Score: 39 John Edwards Score: 34 Rudy Giuliani Score: 33 Bill Richardson Score: 32 Duncan Hunter Score: 32 Hillary Clinton Score: 31 Barack Obama Score: 31