OSU vs LSU SMACK!

THis made me laugh... im a "retarded kid at the circus." :lol: http://uweekly.com/newsmag/01-02-2008/7254 Glad I wasn’t born on the bayou Trash Talk [125 Comment(s)] By Lyndon Collins Louisiana State University is an abhorrent, repulsive, abortioned version of a real football school. Everything about that puke bucket sends pulses of hate and rage down my spine. If LSU were only half as important as they thought they were, some one might give a **** about them. But they’re not – and we don’t. I could go through all the standard sophomoric rips on the mascot, the colors, the head coach….blah, blah, blah - but I won’t. I don’t need boring, ad hominem attacks to get a point across. I’m smarter than that. I’m a Buckeye. Firstly, I’d like to congratulate LSU’s students for reading this column. By virtue of having the ability to read, they are already among the brightest minds at LSU, and probably the smartest people in the entire state. Getting a degree from LSU is like being named valedictorian from the Baton Rouge school for the mentally challenged. We’re all very happy for you, but that piece of paper they hand you is better suited for wiping your ass with. In a state that is responsible for plaguing the world with things like the lynch mobs, the Creole language and the entire Spears family (Britney, not Marcus) LSU students find themselves at the top of the Louisiana intelligence mountain…err, molehill. Let me guess, you turned down Tulane and Loyola because you didn’t like the campus, right? Right. As if being the putrid armpit of the nation wasn’t embarrassing enough, each week they put themselves on public display as they support their Johnny-come-lately football team. Listen, kids. You’ve got a cute little football team. You even managed to win a couple national championships. Good for you. Even if you do beat Ohio State (and you won’t), that puts you in the elite company of schools like Pitt, Army, Minnesota and Michigan State. I guess what I’m saying is: you’re just not that big of a deal LSU has a long, long way to go before they have the tradition and pageantry that accompanies a historic program like THE Ohio State University. But that doesn’t stop their fans from acting like anyone besides the sweat glazed, swamp rats that live in that state actually care about them. Although, LSU fans are not without redeeming qualities. They are the passionate sort and turn out in droves to emphatically support their team. I went to the circus once and sat next to a group of retarded kids. They screamed and cheered in ecstasy as a pack of clowns walked through the audience. Welcome to an LSU home game. So enjoy it, LSU!! The BCS National Championship game puts you one step closer to being a mediocre program. By they way: “Mike The Tiger” Seriously? My uncle’s name is Mike. My butchers name is Mike. The guy that installed my cable’s name is Mike. That’s the best you could do? Oh yeah, you went to LSU. I forgot. :lol: way to pick on retarded kids and minority groups. :lol:

the national championship game is gonna suck this year. neither team has impressed me much. i'll be rooting for LSU though (lesser of 2 evils). :)

You would think having their asses handed to them by flawaduh last year may have made them rethink their opinion of the SEC. It's the little 10 though, what are they 3-4 in the bowls, while we are 6-2....

UofM FUCT UP the Heisman award winner led, Defending nat'l champ. SEC ain't got chit!

Who cares about this game? At this point UGA and USC have just as much of a right to a National Championship as LSU and OSU. Call the winner the BCS Champ...but don't call them the National Champion.

Who cares about this game? At this point UGA and USC have just as much of a right to a National Championship as LSU and OSU. Call the winner the BCS Champ...but don't call them the National Champion. I really think USC and Georgia would beat both LSU and tOSU... I think USC would be on top of them all though... but I'm Pac10 Bias... :idk:

I really think USC and Georgia would beat both LSU and tOSU... I think USC would be on top of them all though... but I'm Pac10 Bias... :idk: I would tend to agree with that. But UGA looked tough. They flat out embarrassed Hawaii.

Lets see... Georgia: 2 loss team, didnt win its division less its confrence. USC: 2 loss team, lost to Stanford (unforgivable) and Heisman considered QB @ Oregon. Won its confrence. LSU: 2 loss team, lost in 3 OT to Heisman considered QB @ Kentucky, and lost in 3 OT to Heisman considered RB @ Arkansas. Won its division out right and played an extra game to win its confrence. (which it won with a backup QB, hurt WR's, and their best player (dorsey) on the bench.) USC and UGA are playing great NOW, but dont make the season count for nothing.

Lets see... Georgia: 2 loss team, didnt win its division less its confrence. USC: 2 loss team, lost to Stanford (unforgivable) and Heisman considered QB @ Oregon. Won its confrence. LSU: 2 loss team, lost in 3 OT to Heisman considered QB @ Kentucky, and lost in 3 OT to Heisman considered RB @ Arkansas. Won its division out right and played an extra game to win its confrence. (which it won with a backup QB, hurt WR's, and their best player (dorsey) on the bench.) USC and UGA are playing great NOW, but dont make the season count for nothing. But you can't say either of those teams aren't better than LSU.

[QUOTE=itgirl25;474641]the national championship game is gonna suck this year. neither team has impressed me much. QUOTE] I agree and I'm gonna have to go with the SEC team for the win.

Im not saying that OSU or LSU is playing better (right now) than USC or UGA, but dont discard the entire season.

Right now , Georgia could probably stomp LSU .....but oh well, we'll never know. http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o154/Warputer/thhead-smack.gif

Lets see... Georgia: 2 loss team, didnt win its division less its confrence. USC: 2 loss team, lost to Stanford (unforgivable) and Heisman considered QB @ Oregon. Won its confrence. LSU: 2 loss team, lost in 3 OT to Heisman considered QB @ Kentucky, and lost in 3 OT to Heisman considered RB @ Arkansas. Won its division out right and played an extra game to win its confrence. (which it won with a backup QB, hurt WR's, and their best player (dorsey) on the bench.) USC and UGA are playing great NOW, but dont make the season count for nothing. oh I'm not discounting the season... LSU I think had the best season considering they lost to ranked opponents both in multiple OT's... HOWEVER, I feel that USC and UGA are playing better than LSU or tOSU showed the last couple games I watched. I'm not a big fan of tOSU... LSU I don't dislike but not a favorite same with UGA... but I do pull for USC against anyone but Oregon State... like I said... I'm Pac-10 Bias... but even so... I don't think any of these teams would have put it on Illinois like USC did... :2cents:

I would tend to agree with that. But UGA looked tough. They flat out embarrassed Hawaii. yeah maybe now we'll stop hearing about how much the WAC belongs! :idk: they do have a good team now and then... but the conference as a whole is ****:2cents:

Im not saying that OSU or LSU is playing better (right now) than USC or UGA, but dont discard the entire season. I understand what you're saying. This is the way it's done with the horse$#!T BCS.

UofM FUCT UP the Heisman award winner led, Defending nat'l champ. SEC ain't got chit! Appy State

App state played a hell of a lot better than floriduh did :lol:

App state played a hell of a lot better than floriduh did :lol: So a flawaduh team that wasn't up for the game with a defense that was exposed as very inexperienced by Jawja, LSU, and Allburnt was taken out by a michigan team that was suppose to be the best in the Big 10 this year. It's not that much of an upset, Teabag hung 35 points on them and almost brought them back. Being taken down by a team not even in division 1 football is a lot worse. Bowl record speaks for itself between the conferences SEC 6-2 Little 10 3-5 SEC has the best bowl record out of any division no matter who wins the national championship.

well come monday, well see if a healthy OSU and healthy LSU can look like a force again. As for respect or cred, i dont care because one of these 2 teams play for and will win the shiny trophy that says national champion on it. hey mabye next time we could play a lesser bowl against a lesser opponent and "win" the NC like apparently USC and UGA apparently just did...

So a flawaduh team that wasn't up for the game with a defense that was exposed as very inexperienced by Jawja, LSU, and Allburnt was taken out by a michigan team that was suppose to be the best in the Big 10 this year. It's not that much of an upset, Teabag hung 35 points on them and almost brought them back. Being taken down by a team not even in division 1 football is a lot worse. Bowl record speaks for itself between the conferences SEC 6-2 Little 10 3-5 SEC has the best bowl record out of any division no matter who wins the national championship. not by winning percentage... if LSU wins they'll still be 2nd to the MAC I believe... and if they loose the drop below the Pac10 and someone else... just fyi... I'm sure you were just talking about # of wins and loses though

well come monday, well see if a healthy OSU and healthy LSU can look like a force again. As for respect or cred, i dont care because one of these 2 teams play for and will win the shiny trophy that says national champion on it. hey mabye next time we could play a lesser bowl against a lesser opponent and "win" the NC like apparently USC and UGA apparently just did... I'm not saying give USC or UGA the national championship... they don't deserve it... not with the season they played what I AM saying is... USC and UGA are playing the best football right now that I've seen... and had there been a playoff... I think USC would top them all... I'm not knock'n LSU or tOSU... I just don't think they'd beat USC or UGA right now purely :2cents:

not by winning percentage... if LSU wins they'll still be 2nd to the MAC I believe... and if they loose the drop below the Pac10 and someone else... just fyi... I'm sure you were just talking about # of wins and loses though Percentage out of the BCS conferences, the MAC is not a BCS conference. Sunbelt is #1 in percentage anyway. They only had one team in a bowl and they won. 100% Out of the 6 BCS conferences, Big 12 and the SEC are the only ones with a winning percentage in bowls.

Percentage out of the BCS conferences, the MAC is not a BCS conference. Sunbelt is #1 in percentage anyway. They only had one team in a bowl and they won. 100% ahh ok... well I was going by ESPN and I think they require at least 3 teams from each conference...

Osu Ftw

the national championship game is gonna suck this year. neither team has impressed me much. i'll be rooting for LSU though (lesser of 2 evils). :) Yea but the problem this year for me is there were no two teams that overly impressed me so no matter what matchup we got...without a playoff would have been about the same. Southern Cal looks pretty strong but they got pimp slapped by weak teams as well. :idk: Pulling for LSU because I'm an SEC fan and don't care for the Buckeyes much at all.

go bucks!

go bucks! says the man that owned 03 LSU plates in Ohio. You should put those back on for tonight. :lol:

The Luckeyes have no chance against LSU. I hate the SEC but I see a much better team in the Tigers.

truthfully i dont know how its gonna go. no idea. All i know is that everyone has had more than enough time to heal, prepare, and focus... so win or lose someone will get just plain beat. i hope its OSU getting beat though. I wonder if the Nebraska head coach will pay attention to the game and not himself when calling defensive plays.

Big 10 folks, yer sweater vest feels good when I wipe my ass with it. GEAUX TIGERS!!!! GEAUX SEC DOMINATION!!!

GO LSU!!!!!!! F**K osu!!

I've been holding this in for 2 years now. SCREW YOU OSU/OSU FANS. i'm sick of this ****. let this be a piece of humble pie. Your team chokes under pressure! they play their hearts out all year, dominating the compitition (that isnt all that tough to begin with) and end up choking once again in the ntn'l championship. choke choke choke. sure ya won a few years ago, in OT! god at least close the gap a little bit, sooner or later your fans arent going to pull the red and white out of the closet half a year after turning the BCS game off after the third quarter. LSU! come on! they've only been a good team for the last few years, while you are supposed to be a dynasty? Hear me out people, I like OSU. I think they are a good team. i THOUGHT they deserved a second chance. but i think they are earning a spot on my "overrated" list. If the championship games they were playing in were CLOSE then i wouldnt be making these allegations. Its not that they are loosing these games, its that they go out and play them like some other team, maybe a division II team. by the time things arent going the way they want them too the team looks scared, timid, and morally depreciated. why is OSU scared of holding a title again?

That was a good game. Nice to see OSU get smacked around!

"Oh how I hate, Oh how I hate Ohio State" Come on all, sing it.... :cheers:

Hey, how do you get to Columbus? Head south until you smell sh*t, then head east until you step in it. :lol:

Not my school but glad to see another SEC school win the big one...congrats LSU !! :cheers:

Not my school but glad to see another SEC school win the big one...congrats LSU !! :cheers: oh well. BCS was all kinds of f'ked up this year anyways.

oh well. BCS was all kinds of f'ked up this year anyways. I'm glad LSU won. Just another case for getting rid of the completely F#*Ked up BCS.

Just another case for getting rid of the completely F#*Ked up BCS. :iagree:

I'm glad LSU won. Just another case for getting rid of the completely F#*Ked up BCS. It's mainly the big 10's fault (with a little pac 10 sprinkled in) that the system isn't changed... Why would you guys want a +1 or playoff system? You get an easy conference schedule, no conference championship game, easy OOC games with a nice pretty "Rose"y path to the MNCG.... Jim Delaney sure as hell isn't going to give up the money that is involved with that...

sure as hell isn't going to give up the money that is involved with that... That tends to always be the problem right there sir.

THere's a lot wrong with College football.

The big 10 has scheduled games after Thanksgiving next year. :cheers: So the problem of OSU moving up in the polls when they don't even play that week is now solved.

THere's a lot wrong with College football. yeah but i typically prefer watching the college ball games compared to pro... the kids at least try to go for the ball, ya know? Wish I could have watched the LSU/OSU game.

yeah but i typically prefer watching the college ball games compared to pro... the kids at least try to go for the ball, ya know? Wish I could have watched the LSU/OSU game. Oh I know. Me too. I'm talking the quasi playoff system.

Soonest we can hope for a +1 is in 2011, current fox contract is up then. ACC, SEC, Big East, and Big 12 are already discussing it. PAC 10 and Big 10+1 want no part of it. I say have a +2 system. It's already set up for that. Take the winners of each BCS bowl and make them play a semifinal and championship game. That would be the best system we could hope for besides a full out playoff.

playoffs would be the best imho.... oh and i hate lsu Luck Fsu :motz:

playoffs would be the best imho.... oh and i hate lsu Luck Fsu :motz: pwned

:iagree:

atleast i hate lsu, with uf i was kinda on the fence, i claim both teams as mine :idk:

Yes a playoff would be nice...BUT with several conferences that won't even have a championship game and then teams like freakin' Nortre Dame that won't even join a conference...several changes need to take place.:tt:

Yes a playoff would be nice...BUT with several conferences that won't even have a championship game and then teams like freakin' Nortre Dame that won't even join a conference...several changes need to take place.:tt: Thats why you use the BCS bowls as the first round of the playoff, ND isn't guaranteed a spot. The BCS conferences get an automatic bid for their champions and you only are allowed to have 2 teams from each BCS conference. You aren't going to get all the good teams in, but the ones that deserve to be there (BCS conference champions) will be there and they will have a shot to win it all.

Thats why you use the BCS bowls as the first round of the playoff, ND isn't guaranteed a spot. The BCS conferences get an automatic bid for their champions and you only are allowed to have 2 teams from each BCS conference. You aren't going to get all the good teams in, but the ones that deserve to be there (BCS conference champions) will be there and they will have a shot to win it all. I guess then...all conferences need to have a championship game or all need to not have one then...it just needs to be even when entering the "playoff" imho. I mean Georgia...Hawaii and Illinois go to a BCS but Tennessee doesn't because they lost in the conference championship...but they won the East ? If they had beaten LSU...who would have gotten in with Tennessee...either LSU or Georgia but not both...it's kind of screwy and this is just one example. Missouri is another...they beat Kansas. :idk:

I guess then...all conferences need to have a championship game or all need to not have one then...it just needs to be even when entering the "playoff" imho. I mean Georgia...Hawaii and Illinois go to a BCS but Tennessee doesn't because they lost in the conference championship...but they won the East ? If they had beaten LSU...who would have gotten in with Tennessee...either LSU or Georgia but not both...it's kind of screwy and this is just one example. Missouri is another...they beat Kansas. :idk: I say let the conferences do what they want, you honestly think Tennessee should of went to a bcs bowl this year??? They sucked for most of it... Hey drewpy - WHAT WHAT!! http://msn.foxsports.com/id/7650164_7_2.jpg

I say let the conferences do what they want, you honestly think Tennessee should of went to a bcs bowl this year??? They sucked for most of it... Hey drewpy - WHAT WHAT!! http://msn.foxsports.com/id/7650164_7_2.jpg No but that's just one part of my point. I don't really think they should have gone but Georgia was behind them in the conference and Tennessee flat out spanked them when they played...plus South Carolna beat Georgia too. I don't think Illinois nor Hawaii should have gone either. Kansas shouldn't have gone over Missouri. Ok then so any team including Tennessee can pull out of their conference...play 12 cupcakes and be in the playoff every year...that's BS. Several think LSU shouldn't be champ with two losses to unranked teams...and Ohio State shouldn't have been there with such a weaksauce schedule...see we can go back and forth all day with this one. If the playoff is going to be fair...or at least closer to fair...imho all conferences/teams should go by the same rules...not with one team in a conference...one not...another team from a conference having to play in a conference championship...another team from a conference not having to play in a championship game....blah...blah...blah...

No but that's just one part of my point. I don't really think they should have gone but Georgia was behind them in the conference and Tennessee flat out spanked them when they played...plus South Carolna beat Georgia too. I don't think Illinois nor Hawaii should have gone either. Kansas shouldn't have gone over Missouri. Ok then so any team including Tennessee can pull out of their conference...play 12 cupcakes and be in the playoff every year...that's BS. Several think LSU shouldn't be champ with two losses to unranked teams...and Ohio State shouldn't have been there with such a weaksauce schedule...see we can go back and forth all day with this one. If the playoff is going to be fair...or at least closer to fair...imho all conferences/teams should go by the same rules...not with one team in a conference...one not...another team from a conference having to play in a conference championship...another team from a conference not having to play in a championship game....blah...blah...blah... Think about this now that you have said that, reduce the teams by two because there is no championship bowl now with a BCS bowl playoff series. Here are the teams: West Virginia Oklahoma Hawaii Georgia Illinois Kansas Virginia Tech LSU tOSU USC Ok these teams get auto bids for being BCS conference champions: West Virginia Oklahoma LSU USC tOSU Virginia Tech Pick 2 more teams based on BCS standings and only two per conference: Georgia Kansas Eliminates lower ranked Illinois and Hawaii.... Seeding: 1 tOSU 2 LSU 3 VT 4 Oklahoma 5 Georgia 6 USC 7 Kansas 8 West Virginia First Round would be based on standings and bowl affliation: Rose: tOSU West Virginia to play next Fiesta: Oklahoma Georgia -------------------- Sugar: LSU Kansas to play next Orange: Virginia Tech USC Who is missing that should of been there? No one, these teams are the best of the best and deserved to be here. Mizzou lost the champ game and don't deserve it. Too bad..... UT may have won the east, but they have 2 more losses than UGA and even if you discount the SEC champ, they still have one more loss than UT and don't deserve a shot. Basically, who should be there is there.

Think about this now that you have said that, reduce the teams by two because there is no championship bowl now with a BCS bowl playoff series. Here are the teams: West Virginia Oklahoma Hawaii Georgia Illinois Kansas Virginia Tech LSU tOSU USC Ok these teams get auto bids for being BCS conference champions: West Virginia Oklahoma LSU USC tOSU Virginia Tech Pick 2 more teams based on BCS standings and only two per conference: Georgia Kansas Eliminates lower ranked Illinois and Hawaii.... Seeding: 1 tOSU 2 LSU 3 VT 4 Oklahoma 5 Georgia 6 USC 7 Kansas 8 West Virginia First Round would be based on standings and bowl affliation: Rose: tOSU West Virginia to play next Fiesta: Oklahoma Georgia -------------------- Sugar: LSU Kansas to play next Orange: Virginia Tech USC Who is missing that should of been there? No one, these teams are the best of the best and deserved to be here. Mizzou lost the champ game and don't deserve it. Too bad..... UT may have won the east, but they have 2 more losses than UGA and even if you discount the SEC champ, they still have one more loss than UT and don't deserve a shot. Basically, who should be there is there. Now thats what I want to see!!!!!:cheers:

It's mainly the big 10's fault (with a little pac 10 sprinkled in) that the system isn't changed... Why would you guys want a +1 or playoff system? You get an easy conference schedule, no conference championship game, easy OOC games with a nice pretty "Rose"y path to the MNCG.... Jim Delaney sure as hell isn't going to give up the money that is involved with that... well there was a article in the Oregonian my dad forwarded me about the Pac10... while not every head coach in the pac10 was completely on board for a play off system... they all agreed they need to change the current system... some wanted a full playoff... others wanted a +1. I wonder who in the Pac-10 is holding it up then :idk: Think about this now that you have said that, reduce the teams by two because there is no championship bowl now with a BCS bowl playoff series. Here are the teams: West Virginia Oklahoma Hawaii Georgia Illinois Kansas Virginia Tech LSU tOSU USC Ok these teams get auto bids for being BCS conference champions: West Virginia Oklahoma LSU USC tOSU Virginia Tech Pick 2 more teams based on BCS standings and only two per conference: Georgia Kansas Eliminates lower ranked Illinois and Hawaii.... Seeding: 1 tOSU 2 LSU 3 VT 4 Oklahoma 5 Georgia 6 USC 7 Kansas 8 West Virginia First Round would be based on standings and bowl affliation: Rose: tOSU West Virginia to play next Fiesta: Oklahoma Georgia -------------------- Sugar: LSU Kansas to play next Orange: Virginia Tech USC Who is missing that should of been there? No one, these teams are the best of the best and deserved to be here. Mizzou lost the champ game and don't deserve it. Too bad..... UT may have won the east, but they have 2 more losses than UGA and even if you discount the SEC champ, they still have one more loss than UT and don't deserve a shot. Basically, who should be there is there. I can't argue with that :cheers:

well there was a article in the Oregonian my dad forwarded me about the Pac10... while not every head coach in the pac10 was completely on board for a play off system... they all agreed they need to change the current system... some wanted a full playoff... others wanted a +1. I wonder who in the Pac-10 is holding it up then :idk: The people who make the money by not playing more games. The commissioner and people who never make any gameday decisions.

The people who make the money by not playing more games. The commissioner and people who never make any gameday decisions. the ones who hide behind the word "tradition" as to being so inflexible. College football is BIG BUISNESS now so it really needs to be somewhat standardized if there is so much money going around. Hell, even the BCS Champ trophy is $30,000.00!!!

:jd: that was the most impressive thing i have seen you post to date

Think about this now that you have said that, reduce the teams by two because there is no championship bowl now with a BCS bowl playoff series. Here are the teams: West Virginia Oklahoma Hawaii Georgia Illinois Kansas Virginia Tech LSU tOSU USC Ok these teams get auto bids for being BCS conference champions: West Virginia Oklahoma LSU USC tOSU Virginia Tech Pick 2 more teams based on BCS standings and only two per conference: Georgia Kansas Eliminates lower ranked Illinois and Hawaii.... Seeding: 1 tOSU 2 LSU 3 VT 4 Oklahoma 5 Georgia 6 USC 7 Kansas 8 West Virginia First Round would be based on standings and bowl affliation: Rose: tOSU West Virginia to play next Fiesta: Oklahoma Georgia -------------------- Sugar: LSU Kansas to play next Orange: Virginia Tech USC Who is missing that should of been there? No one, these teams are the best of the best and deserved to be here. Mizzou lost the champ game and don't deserve it. Too bad..... UT may have won the east, but they have 2 more losses than UGA and even if you discount the SEC champ, they still have one more loss than UT and don't deserve a shot. Basically, who should be there is there. This doesn't look bad and is definitely better than the current system. I agree about Hawaii and Illinois...the UT thing well again I say...who from the SEC would have gone under your plan IF UT had beaten LSU ? UT would have been the SEC champ...so who stays home Georgia or LSU (?)...just a thought. Yea I know...it didn't happen so it doesn't really matter. Ok one more thing...Missouri...they beat Kansas...but Kansas goes ? So if Missouri had beaten Oklahoma I guess Oklahoma would have stayed home under your plan ? Sounds like Kansas got rewarded for losing to Missouri to me. Again...what you came up with is a hell of alot better than what we currently have. :cheers:

This doesn't look bad and is definitely better than the current system. I agree about Hawaii and Illinois...the UT thing well again I say...who from the SEC would have gone under your plan IF UT had beaten LSU ? UT would have been the SEC champ...so who stays home Georgia or LSU (?)...just a thought. Yea I know...it didn't happen so it doesn't really matter. Ok one more thing...Missouri...they beat Kansas...but Kansas goes ? So if Missouri had beaten Oklahoma I guess Oklahoma would have stayed home under your plan ? Sounds like Kansas got rewarded for losing to Missouri to me. Again...what you came up with is a hell of alot better than what we currently have. :cheers: Under my plan it would be based of BCS ranking system for the two at large spots. Looking at the BCS rankings before the bowls, I am not sure why Kansas went even though Mizzou was ahead of them in the BCS rankings. I thought Kansas jumped Mizzou in the BCS because Mizzou had two losses to OU and Kansas only had one loss to Mizzou, but they didn't jump them. Under this system I would change that to Mizzou going instead of Kansas. The two at large spots would be filled by the top two BCS ranked teams besides the conference champs. If UT beat LSU for the SEC championship, yes UT would go instead of LSU as the SEC rep. Obiviously since LSU would have 3 losses to UGA's 2 and probably falling behind them in the BCS, they wouldn't get one of the two at large spots. However, say LSU had only 1 loss this year and lost to UT in the conference champ putting them to 2 losses and still in the mix. The two at large spots would be determined by the polls still, but all your major conference champions who are deserving are still in the mix. There would still be penalty from having a championship game for your conference, but it leaves that decision up to the conference because no matter what, you are sending one team to the playoffs.

Under my plan it would be based of BCS ranking system for the two at large spots. Looking at the BCS rankings before the bowls, I am not sure why Kansas went even though Mizzou was ahead of them in the BCS rankings. I thought Kansas jumped Mizzou in the BCS because Mizzou had two losses to OU and Kansas only had one loss to Mizzou, but they didn't jump them. Under this system I would change that to Mizzou going instead of Kansas. The two at large spots would be filled by the top two BCS ranked teams besides the conference champs. If UT beat LSU for the SEC championship, yes UT would go instead of LSU as the SEC rep. Obiviously since LSU would have 3 losses to UGA's 2 and probably falling behind them in the BCS, they wouldn't get one of the two at large spots. However, say LSU had only 1 loss this year and lost to UT in the conference champ putting them to 2 losses and still in the mix. The two at large spots would be determined by the polls still, but all your major conference champions who are deserving are still in the mix. There would still be penalty from having a championship game for your conference, but it leaves that decision up to the conference because no matter what, you are sending one team to the playoffs. Makes sense...less do it. :lol: :cheers:

Under my plan it would be based of BCS ranking system for the two at large spots. Looking at the BCS rankings before the bowls, I am not sure why Kansas went even though Mizzou was ahead of them in the BCS rankings. I thought Kansas jumped Mizzou in the BCS because Mizzou had two losses to OU and Kansas only had one loss to Mizzou, but they didn't jump them. Under this system I would change that to Mizzou going instead of Kansas. The two at large spots would be filled by the top two BCS ranked teams besides the conference champs. If UT beat LSU for the SEC championship, yes UT would go instead of LSU as the SEC rep. Obiviously since LSU would have 3 losses to UGA's 2 and probably falling behind them in the BCS, they wouldn't get one of the two at large spots. However, say LSU had only 1 loss this year and lost to UT in the conference champ putting them to 2 losses and still in the mix. The two at large spots would be determined by the polls still, but all your major conference champions who are deserving are still in the mix. There would still be penalty from having a championship game for your conference, but it leaves that decision up to the conference because no matter what, you are sending one team to the playoffs. Now how do we get your idea accepted by the BCS????

Now how do we get your idea accepted by the BCS???? Punch the adminstration of the PAC 10 and Big 10 in the sack until they agree.

Punch the adminstration of the PAC 10 and Big 10 in the sack until they agree. :smash: :smash:

Punch the adminstration of the PAC 10 and Big 10 in the sack until they agree. Me>:nkick: