[Pigface1]

I used to be adamantly against it, two wrongs don't make a right, that makes us no better than them.

But, screw it. . I don't see why we should pay 6 figures per year to keep a worthless sack of s*** alive when money could be spent on children's hospitals, etc. So, I'm all for it. . however, it would require dna evidence, etc etc.

Personally, unless someone is a full blown vegan, I don't think they have room to be strongly opposed to capital punishment.

 

[Pigface1]

\Terry Nichols and other terrorists are good examples.

We went crazy out here about that, and McVeigh as well. Perspective changes completely when something like that hits close to home.

 

[Pigface1]

Here an example is the guy who encouraged that kid to join him in the random shootings out East (sorry, can't remember those names).

The Beltway Snipers?

As a whole I think drug offenders shouldn't be behind bars, and violent offenders should be there indefinitely.

 

[Pigface1]

Need4Speed:
I think if someone breaks the law, they break the law. I feel the same about drunk driving. . punish them accordingly, but blame it on the person, not the chemical. If someone wants to sit in their house and get stoned out of their mind, I have no problem with that, just like I have no problem if they sit in their house and drink until they puke.

The reference I make to drunk driving is this. . If someone is drunk and hits one of us while we're riding and kills us, they're going to jail for manslaughter at least. If that same person is sober, they'll most likely just get a ticket b/c they "didn't see the bike."

It's bullshyt. . you're either a danger, or you're not.

So yeah, do nothing with drug offenders. I see no reason to have a pothead in prison all the while letting a convicted rapist out to make room. That happens almost daily.

However, none of that will ever happen, I've come to terms with that. lol